Feed intelligence
What you formulated, against what the lab actually found
A feed programme and a production dip are usually discussed in separate conversations, weeks apart. Here they sit on the same flock record, on the same timeline.
Formulations
Versioned, with a lifecycle that reflects how nutritionists work
A formulation is not a single row that gets edited. It moves through states, and every analysis records the version it was measured against.
- Draft
- Under review
- Approved
- Active
- Retired
Nutrient targets
Effective dates
Diet history
Analysis
Measured against theoretical, with the reasoning shown
Upload the laboratory report or enter the values directly. Each nutrient is compared against the target for the relevant formulation version and scored pass, warning or fail based on the tolerance the nutritionist set — not a generic rule of thumb.
-
Measured and theoretical are always distinguishable
The interface never blurs what was formulated with what was found.
-
Variance is shown as a number and a judgement
A five percent deviation matters for some nutrients and not others. The tolerance decides which.
-
Trends, not just snapshots
A nutrient that drifts across four consecutive analyses is a different problem from one that missed once.
-
It reaches the report
Feed analysis is part of the consultation report, alongside production and comments.
Illustrative analysis result
Values shown for illustration. Nutrient catalogue, laboratory formats and comparison rules are finalised with the nutrition team.
Have a formulation and a lab report handy?
Those two documents make for a far more useful conversation than a slide deck.